PCPNDT ACT

"It's not an offense under the PCPNDT Act, if the computer generated reports like ' F Forms'  are signed by the owner of the Hospital, instead of   the concerned Sonologist/ Radiologist" - Hon. Supreme Court. But, "Rightful delegation of Power to AA was upheld" Adv. ROHiT ERANDE. © Case Details : APPROPRIATE AUTHORITY UNDER THE PCPNDT ACT, PIMPRI CHINCHWAD MUNICIPAL CORPORATION , Maharashtra V/s. DR. RAJENDER AMIRCHAND SUJANYAL & ORS Criminal Appeal No.38/2022.  Judgment Link https://main.sci.gov.in/supremecourt/2017/8209/8209_2017_44_10_32365_Order_06-Jan-2022.pdf Facts in Short : 1. This case is from PCMC, Pune. The Appellant challnged the Order of Hon. Bombay High Court.  The Original Petitioner No.1 is the Gynaecologist runs a “Stree Hospital”, with licensed Ultrasound sonography machines. Petitioner No.2 is the visiting qualified radiologist / sonologist in the said Hospital. 2. The Commissioner of PCMC, who is otherwise, AA, delegated his power...

 " The Machine which is registered under the PCPNDT Act cannot be carried to other place which is not registered" : Hon. Bombay High Court. Adv. Rohit Erande. © In short, One Machine - One Place - One Registration. In its recently reported judgment of Dr. Deepak Sane V/s. State of Maharashtra, 2017(1) Mh.L.J.379, W.P. no.2995/2015, The Division Bench at Nagpur held so.. Facts in short : 1. The petitioner is the leading Medical Practitioner in Nagpur and dealing exclusively with Heart Treatment. He is required to use the 2D Echo Colour Doppler Machine for Treating his patients and for treating the patients he requires to visit the ICCU at different Hospitals. 2. IT was the case of the petitioner that he needy patients who cannot come to his clinic, for them he has to carry his 2D Echo machine, which is duly registered under the provisions of PCPNDT Act.Therefore he applied to the concerned authorities for getting permission to move the said machine at different places, but sa...